Civilian Casualties

Civilian Casualties

Belligerent
Country
start date
end date
Civilian Harm Status
Belligerent Assessment
Declassified Documents
Infrastructure

Incident Code

USYEMTr171

Incident date

June 30, 2018

Location

البيضاء, شبوه, حضرموت, Al Bayda, Shabwah, or Hadramout, Yemen

Geolocation

15.301065, 47.856830 Note: The accuracy of this location is to Province/governorate level. Continue to map

Airwars assessment

A US airstrike targeted AQAP in either Shabwah, Hadramawt or Al-Bayda governorate on June 30th 2018, according to CENTCOM. There were no known public reports of a strike on that date.

According to the Yemen monitor New America: “On July 3rd, CENTCOM confirmed in an email to New America that it conducted two air strikes in Yemen in June 2018. One strike occurred on June 23rd and another on June 30th. CENTCOM did not provide further details on the location, target, or number of casualties from the strikes.”

An August 30th CENTCOM release narrowed the event down to three provinces: “U.S. Central Command has conducted six counterterrorism air strikes targeting al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula terrorist network in Yemen in three separate governorates since May 16, bringing the total number of air strikes to 34. These include air strikes May 25, two airstrikes June 23 and 30, two airstrikes July 22 and 24, and one Aug. 14. These air strikes took place in Shabwah, Hadramawt and Al-Bayda governorates.”

The local time of the incident is unknown.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Declared strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Cause of injury / death
    Heavy weapons and explosive munitions
  • Known attacker
    US Forces
  • Known target
    Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

Sources (2) [ collapse]

Geolocation notes (1) [ collapse]

Reports of the incident mention the governorates of Al Bayda (البيضاء), Shabwah (شبوه), and Hadramout (حضرموت) without any specific spatial information. Due to limited satellite imagery and information available to Airwars, we were unable to verify the location further. The generic coordinates are: 15.301065, 47.856830.

  • Reports of the incident mention the governorates of Al Bayda (البيضاء), Shabwah (شبوه), and Hadramout (حضرموت) without any specific spatial information.

    Imagery:
    Google Earth

US Forces Assessment:

  • Known belligerent
    US Forces
  • US Forces position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Original strike reports

US Forces

TAMPA, Fla. –U.S. Central Command has conducted six counterterrorism air strikes targeting al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula terrorist network in Yemen in three separate governorates since May 16, bringing the total number of air strikes to 34.



These include air strikes May 25, two airstrikes June 23 and 30, two airstrikes July 22 and 24, and one Aug. 14. These air strikes took place in Shabwah, Hadramawt and Al-Bayda governorates.

A recent United Nations report assessed AQAP leaders recognize Yemen as a hub for external operations.



“AQAP has taken advantage of the conflicts in Yemen, to plot, direct and encourage terror attacks abroad,” said Lt. Col. Earl Brown, a USCENTCOM spokesman. “We will not relent on our pursuit of AQAP terrorists as they remain a significant threat to regional security and stability, and the safety of Americans at home and abroad.”

Summary

  • Strike status
    Declared strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Cause of injury / death
    Heavy weapons and explosive munitions
  • Known attacker
    US Forces
  • Known target
    Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

Sources (2) [ collapse]

Incident Code

USYEMTr216

Incident date

January 2–3, 2020

Location

الجراف/حدة, Al Jarf/Hadda, Sana'a, Yemen

Geolocation

15.399569, 44.209156 Note: The accuracy of this location is to District level. Continue to map

Airwars assessment

A US drone strike reportedly targeted Abdul Reza Shahlai, an Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Qods Force commander in Sana’a, overnight from January 2nd-3rd 2020.

While initial reports suggested that Shahlai had been killed in the strike, official sources later indicated that he had survived. There was some indication that another Iranian soldier was killed, however. The strike reportedly took place alongside a second confirmed US drone strike in Iraq, which assassinated Iranian commander Qasem Suleimani early on January 3rd. There were no known associated reports of civilian harm in the strike.

The specific circumstances of the strike were unclear. Though reports initially emerged late on January 3rd, with some suggesting that the attack took place around that time, later reporting by outlets including the Washington Post, ABC, and CNN instead indicated that it took place on the same night as the strike that killed General Suleimani. This chimes with an Erem News report that local sources in Sana’a had denied that there were any airstrikes overnight from January 3rd-4th.

Local language outlets also reported that the strike took place some time overnight from January 2nd-3rd. According to Tahdeeth, the attack took place in the Al Jarf area of Sana’a on January 2nd. Yemen Time further indicated, according to local sources, that the strike took place at 4am “on the day of the killing of Qassem Soleimani”, January 3rd, in the Hadda area of Sana’a city, near the Faj Atan area. According to analyst Joshua Koontz (@JoshuaKoontz__), Hadda lies around 4.5 miles from Al Jarf.

Though initial reports, from Twitter users including @muard_doden and @raed_alamassi, suggested that the strike targeted a car, Yemen Times reported that the target was a house. US officials likewise told ABC News that the strike targeted Shahlai in his “compound”. While most indicated that the attack took the form of a drone strike, a few sources, such as @wesleysmorgan, suggested that the action was a US Special Forces operation.

Four US officials told the Washington Post that Shahlai had survived the attack. “If we had killed him, we’d be bragging about it that same night”, a senior US official told the Washington Post. The Intercept later reported that Shahlai went into hiding after the strike, according to a US counter-terrorism official.

It was further reported by The Intercept that a “lower-level Quds Force operative” was killed in the strike. Sources variously indicated that the killed operative was Iranian Revolutionary Guard leader Mustafa Muhammad Mirzai. On January 6th 2020, Aden Gad reported that, according to Iranian media, Mirzai, was killed in vague “clashes” in Yemen. Iranian state media also reported that Mirzai had died on January 3rd in “one of the fields of the Resistance Front”, at the same time acknowledging a military fatality in Yemen for the first time, according to journalist Amir Toumaj.

Analyst Joshua Koontz also indicated that, according to the IRGC-linked Fars News Agency, Mirzai’s body was flown back to Iran for a funeral in Shahr-e-Ray, Tehran, on January 6th 2020. Quoting Fars, Joshua Koontz indicated that Mirzai was a “comms expert” who had also travelled to Iraq and Syria.

The alleged target of the strike, Abdul Reza Shahlai, supervised the Quds Force division aiding Houthi forces in the Yemeni civil war, The Intercept reported. In December 2019, the US State Department declared a $15 million reward for information on Shahlai. He has been linked to a January 2007 attack on the Karbala Joint Provincial Coordination Centre in Iraq, in which five US soldiers were kidnapped and later killed. In 2011, the US had listed him as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, for allegedly planning to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the US. The US Special Representative for Iran, Brian Hook, also said in 2019 that the US was “gravely concerned by his presence in Yemen and potential role in providing advanced weaponry of the kind we have interdicted to the Houthis”.

The Pentagon was coy about the attack. “We have seen the report of a January 2 airstrike in Yemen, which is long-understood as a safe space for terrorists and other adversaries to the United States. The Department of Defense does not discuss alleged operations in the region.” said Pentagon spokeswoman Cmdr. Rebecca Rebarich in a statement to the press.

Subsequently, CENTCOM informed Airwars that it had conducted no strikes in Yemen during January 2020. Officials told the Washington Post, however, that “officials at the Pentagon and at military commands in Florida were monitoring both strikes”, suggesting that the US military had conducted the strike. The DoD also announced, at the time, that they had conducted the strike against Suleimani in Iraq. It is therefore likely that this action was an undeclared US military operation.

Several news outlets reported that the attempted killing of Shahlai undercut the rationale given by US officials for the parallel strike on Qasem Suleimani in Iraq. In the aftermath of the Suleimani strike, The Intercept reported, the US had submitted a letter to the United Nations Security Council, stating that the strike exercised its “inherent right to self-defence”. US officials and President Trump also justified the strike on the basis of an imminent threat posed by Suleimani.

The reported strike in Yemen, however, suggested “a mission with a longer planning horizon and a larger objective, and it really does call into question why there was an attempt to explain this publicly on the basis of an imminent threat”, Suzanne Maloney, an Iran scholar at the Brookings Institution, told the Washington Post. A US official indicated to The Intercept that a strike against Shahlai had been discussed in the Trump administration for three years, “as a means of deterring further Iranian support for the Houthis in Yemen”.

Further, this strike against a Houthi ally was reported to be a significant deviation from prior US policy in Yemen, which had previously emphasised “counter-terrorism” efforts against AQAP and, more recently, ISIS. The attempted killing of Shahlai in Yemen – coupled with the assassination of Suleimani in Iraq at the same time – may point to a preplanned decapitation attempt by the US against the senior leadership of Iran’s military.

Though CENTCOM did not confirm the strike, several major news outlets including ABC News and the Washington Post printed comments from US officials who confirmed details of the attack

The incident occured during the night.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Declared strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike, Counter-Terrorism Action (Ground), Drone Strike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Causes of injury / death
    Heavy weapons and explosive munitions, Small arms and light weapons
  • Known attacker
    US Forces
  • Known target
    Other
  • Belligerents reported killed
    1

Sources (56) [ collapse]

Media
from sources (8) [ collapse]

  • Iranian Qods Force commander Abdul Reza Shahlai was reportedly the target of the alleged strike, though reports indicated that he survived (@Levitt_Matt, January 6th 2020)
  • Iranian Qods Force "operative" Mohammed Mirzai was alleged to have been killed in the strike (@AmirToumaj, January 6th 2020)
  • Analyst Joshua Koontz mapped two alleged locations of the strike, Al-Jarf and Hadda (@JoshuaKoontz__, January 14th 2020)
  • The US administration officially denied the strike, as in this transcript of an interview of the Defence Secretary by a news host (@rgoodlaw, January 12th 2020)

Geolocation notes (2) [ collapse]

Reports of the incident mention separate locations within the Sana’a City (امانة العاصمه) district. According to one source, @JoshuaKoontz__, these are the Al Jarf (الجراف) area, for which the generic coordinates are: 15.399569, 44.209156, and the Hadda (حدة) area, south of Sana’a, at these generic coordinates: 15.303724, 44.190960. Due to limited satellite imagery and information available to Airwars, we were unable to verify the location further.

  • Reports of the incident mention separate locations located within the Sana’a City (امانة العاصمه) district. According to one source, @JoshuaKoontz__, these are the Al Jarf (الجراف) area, and the Hadda (حدة) area, south of Sana’a

    Imagery:
    Google Earth

  • @JoshuaKoontz__ alleges that two seperate areas have been identified as locations of the strike, these are the Al Jarf (الجراف) area, and the Hadda (حدة) area, south of Sana’a.

    Imagery:
    @JoshuaKoontz__

US Forces Assessment:

  • Known belligerent
    US Forces
  • US Forces position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Original strike reports

US Forces

Though CENTCOM did not confirm the strike, several major news outlets including ABC News and the Washington Post printed comments from US officials who confirmed details of the attack: US officials told ABC News that the strike targeted Shahlai in his “compound”. While most indicated that the attack took the form of a drone strike, a few sources, such as @wesleysmorgan, suggested that the action was a US Special Forces operation. Four US officials told the Washington Post that Shahlai had survived the attack. “If we had killed him, we’d be bragging about it that same night”, a senior US official told the Washington Post.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Declared strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike, Counter-Terrorism Action (Ground), Drone Strike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Causes of injury / death
    Heavy weapons and explosive munitions, Small arms and light weapons
  • Known attacker
    US Forces
  • Known target
    Other
  • Belligerents reported killed
    1

Sources (56) [ collapse]

Incident Code

USYEM114-N

Incident date

July 28, 2012

Location

المحفد, Mahfad, Abyan, Yemen

Geolocation

14.060462, 46.914385 Note: The accuracy of this location is to Town level. Continue to map

Airwars assessment

On July 28th 2012 alleged Yemeni or US fighter jets bombed two suspected Al Qaeda hideouts in the Mahfad district of the Abyan Province with an unknown number of casualties as reported by Xinhua news who got their information from a local security official and a local resident.

The security official quoted by Xinhua news said: “It was not immediately clear if any of the Al Qaeda militants or some of their local leaders were killed in the air strikes. The bombing was in response to Wednesday’s Al Qaeda attack on pro-government checkpoints.”

A local resident said: “huge black [smoke] and fire erupted in one of the targeted compounds after military aircrafts fired some rockets on it” and that “[a]n abandoned Al Qaeda training site was also pounded in the air shelling”.

The attacks were attributed to Yemeni jets but its Air Force lacks the technical capability to carry out precision strikes. Therefore, US aircraft and armed drones may have been responsible.

This incident was identified by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and has been included in Airwars’ database even though no casualties are mentioned.

The local time of the incident is unknown.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Single source claim
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Suspected attackers
    US Forces, Yemeni Air Force
  • Suspected target
    Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

Sources (1) [ collapse]

Geolocation notes

Reports of the incident mention the town of Mahfad (المحفد), for which the generic coordinates are: 14.060462, 46.914385. Due to limited information and satellite imagery available to Airwars, we were unable to verify the location further.

US Forces Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    US Forces
  • US Forces position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Yemeni Air Force Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Yemeni Air Force
  • Yemeni Air Force position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Summary

  • Strike status
    Single source claim
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Suspected attackers
    US Forces, Yemeni Air Force
  • Suspected target
    Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

Sources (1) [ collapse]

Incident Code

USYEMTr082

Incident date

April 30, 2017

Location

المدارة, Al Madara, Abyan, Yemen

Geolocation

13.8749, 46.0918 Note: The accuracy of this location is to Village level. Continue to map

Airwars assessment

A US drone strike reportedly targeted alleged AQAP militants near Al Madara village, in the Mudiyah district of Abyan governorate, late on April 30th 2017. There were no known associated reports of civilian harm.

Multiple social-media sources, including @WeenAlEnfigar and @BaFana3, reported that US drones were seen flying in the area at the time, and that a “large explosion” was heard in the east of the district.

Twitter user @demolinari specified that the strike targeted AQAP near Al-Madara: “US drones flying regularly over central #Abyan launched a strike on #AQAP near Al-Madara village south of #Mudiyah town. #SouthYemen #Yemen”.

The incident occured during the night.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Likely strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike, Drone Strike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Cause of injury / death
    Heavy weapons and explosive munitions
  • Suspected attacker
    US Forces
  • Suspected target
    Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

Sources (7) [ collapse]

Media
from sources (2) [ collapse]

Geolocation notes

Reports of the incident mention the village of Al Madara (المدارة), south of Mudiyah (موديه) town, for which the generic coordinates are: 13.8749, 46.0918. Due to limited satellite imagery and information available to Airwars, we were unable to verify the location further.

US Forces Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    US Forces
  • US Forces position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Summary

  • Strike status
    Likely strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike, Drone Strike
  • Civilian harm reported
    No
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Cause of injury / death
    Heavy weapons and explosive munitions
  • Suspected attacker
    US Forces
  • Suspected target
    Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)

Sources (7) [ collapse]

Incident Code

RS3708

Incident date

May 23, 2019

Location

كفر نبل, Kafr Nubul, Idlib , Syria

Airwars assessment

A number of civilians including children and women were killed and injured in Russian forces and/or Syrian regime artillery strikes on Kafr Nubul on May 23rd, 2019, according to local sources.

In one news SMART reported that “two civilians were wounded by a rocket attack on the town of  Kafr Nubul south of Idlib from the positions of Russian forces near the city of Sakilipiya north of Hama (activists).”

At the same time, SMART reported another incident. “Syrian forces shelled missiles Thursday, May 23rd, 2019 on the city of Kafr Nubul south of the province of Idlib north of Syria, killing three civilians, including a woman and wounding seven others, including two women and two children.”

Three civilians were identified to have died in the attack; Abdul Hamid Al-Ismail, Muhammad Fayez Haj Hamido and Aisha Khalid Al-Junaid (a child). Some sources mentioned that a woman was also killed but there is no information yet.

It was reported that cluster bombs were used in the attack, and the blame was attributed to both Russia and the Syrian regime.

 

The local time of the incident is unknown.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Contested strike
  • Strike type
    Artillery
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    4
  • (1 child1 woman2 men)
  • Civilians reported injured
    9
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Contested
    Competing claims of responsibility e.g. multiple belligerents, or casualties also attributed to ground forces.
  • Suspected attackers
    Russian Military, Syrian Regime
  • Suspected target
    Unknown

Sources (16) [ collapse]

Media
from sources (13) [ collapse]

  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Abdelhamid Ismail was killed in airstrikes on Kafr Nubul on May 23rd, 2019. (via Alaa Al Musa).
  • Muhammad Hajj Hamidou was reported killed in airstrikes on Kafr Nubul on May 23rd, 2019. (via @mos3abJbban).
  • An image by @yamanalbauosh showing a what was described as a cluster bomb used to target Kafr Nubul on May 23rd, 2019.
  • Raids on Kafr Nubul on May 23rd, 2019. (via @yamanalbauosh).

Russian Military Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Russian Military
  • Russian Military position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Syrian Regime Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Syrian Regime
  • Syrian Regime position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Summary

  • Strike status
    Contested strike
  • Strike type
    Artillery
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    4
  • (1 child1 woman2 men)
  • Civilians reported injured
    9
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Contested
    Competing claims of responsibility e.g. multiple belligerents, or casualties also attributed to ground forces.
  • Suspected attackers
    Russian Military, Syrian Regime
  • Suspected target
    Unknown

Sources (16) [ collapse]

Incident Code

RS3694

Incident date

May 13, 2019

Location

كفر نبل, Kafar Nubul , Idlib, Syria

Airwars assessment

Two missiles struck the Syrian Civil Defense Center, destroying the building and damaging several vehicles, according to local sources. The Syrian Network for Human Rights reported that “fixed-wing warplanes” believed to be Russian fired the missiles. The director of the Syrian Civil Defense forces was allegedly lightly wounded in the attack.

Smart News posted a number of detailed photographs on their website which are not for public distribution and therefore not included in this assessment.

The local time of the incident is unknown.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Contested strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Civilians reported injured
    1
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Contested
    Competing claims of responsibility e.g. multiple belligerents, or casualties also attributed to ground forces.
  • Suspected attackers
    Russian Military, Unknown, Syrian Regime
  • Suspected target
    Unknown

Sources (14) [ collapse]

Media
from sources (20) [ collapse]

  • Syrian Civil Defense (SCD) volunteer in front of the SCD building that was destroyed by an alleged Russian missile in Kafar Nabil on May 13 (via the Syrian Network for Human Rights).
  • Vehicle from the Syrian Civil Defense, destroyed by an alleged Russian missile on Kafar Nabil on May 13th (via Syrian Civil Defense).
  • Syrian Civil Defense (SCD) volunteer in front of the SCD building that was destroyed by an alleged Russian missile in Kafar Nabil on May 13 (via the Syrian Civil Defense.
  • Syrian Civil Defense (SCD) building that was destroyed by an alleged Russian missile in Kafar Nabil on May 13 (via the Syrian Civil Defense).
  • Syrian Civil Defense (SCD) volunteers in front of SCD building that was destroyed by an alleged Russian missile in Kafar Nabil on May 13 (via the Syrian Civil Defense).
  • Moment of impact when an alleged Russian missile struck the Syrian Civil Defense building on May 13th (via Syrian Civil Defense).
  • A man holding a flower in a SCD center that was allegedly targeted by Russia or the Syrian regime on May 13th, 2019. Part of the caption says "There is hope"
  • Pictures of the civil defense center in the city of Kafr Nabl, which became out of service as a result of direct bombing by Russian warplanes.
  • Aftermath of an airstrike on SCD center in Kafr Nubul on May 13th, 2019. (Via @IdlibPlus).
  • Aftermath of an airstrike on SCD center in Kafr Nubul on May 13th, 2019. (Via @IdlibPlus).
  • Aftermath of an airstrike on SCD center in Kafr Nubul on May 13th, 2019. (Via @IdlibPlus).
  • Aftermath of an airstrike on SCD center in Kafr Nubul on May 13th, 2019. (Via @IdlibPlus).
  • Pictures of the destruction caused to a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • Damage to a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • Images of destruction caused to a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • Images of destruction caused to a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • Fire broke out in a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • A sign of Kafr Nubul where a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike hit a SCD center on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • A SCD ambulance damaged after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.
  • SCD volunteers responding to the destruction caused to a SCD center in Kafr Nubul after a Russian forces or a Syrian regime airstrike on May 13th, 2019. Copyright SMART, published in the public interest.

Russian Military Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Russian Military
  • Russian Military position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Unknown Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Unknown
  • Unknown position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Syrian Regime Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Syrian Regime
  • Syrian Regime position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Summary

  • Strike status
    Contested strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Civilians reported injured
    1
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Contested
    Competing claims of responsibility e.g. multiple belligerents, or casualties also attributed to ground forces.
  • Suspected attackers
    Russian Military, Unknown, Syrian Regime
  • Suspected target
    Unknown

Sources (14) [ collapse]

Incident Code

YS095

Incident date

September 4, 2020

Location

العلوة , Alawa, Raqqa, Syria

Airwars assessment

A single source reported that three civilians were injured in alleged YPG strikes on Alawa village, Raqqa governorate, on September 4th, 2020.

Khabour wrote that “three civilians were injured by the bombing of the #PYD_PKK militia on Alawa village west of Tel Abid city, north of Raqqa.”

Currently, further information is unavailable to Airwars.

The local time of the incident is unknown.

Summary

  • Strike status
    Single source claim
  • Strike type
    Artillery
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Civilians reported injured
    3
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Weak
    Single source claim, though sometimes featuring significant information.
  • Suspected attacker
    YPG

Sources (1) [ collapse]

YPG Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    YPG
  • YPG position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Summary

  • Strike status
    Single source claim
  • Strike type
    Artillery
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Civilians reported injured
    3
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Weak
    Single source claim, though sometimes featuring significant information.
  • Suspected attacker
    YPG

Sources (1) [ collapse]

Incident Code

RS2972

Incident date

February 4, 2018

Location

التليل‎ ,سراقب, Al Talil neighbourhood, Saraqeb, Idlib, Syria

Geolocation

35.863036, 36.820183 Note: The accuracy of this location is to Exact location (via Airwars) level. Continue to map

Airwars assessment

A chlorine gas assault in Saraqeb, Idlib by the Syrian regime – possibly with Russian support – wounded multiple civilians including children according to local reports, with most victims suffering breathing difficulties.

The Syrian Network for Human Rights said that two barrel bombs were used in this attack. “At least 11 civilians, including three civil defense members, suffocated as Syrian regime helicopters dropped two barrel bombs loaded with poisonous gas on al Sharqi neighborhood in Saraqeb city in Idlib governorate eastern suburb, on February 4th.”

The number of wounded spanned from nine to 24, with the highest toll reported by Sharqiya. Orient News, which reported that 15 were wounded, said three children were among the victims. Both the White Helmets and Qasioun News reported that three civil defence members were among those injured in the attack.

Almost all sources reported the use of chlorine gas in the aerial strike. According to BBC News, residents and doctors in Saraqeb said there was a strong smell following the attack, suggesting that a toxic gas had been used.

Most sources attributed blame to helicopters belonging to the Assad regime. For example, Zaman al Wasl cited a member of the Civil Defense Center in Saraqeb, Laith al-Asmar, who said that “a helicopter belonging to the Assad regime targeted the city with two explosive barrels containing chlorine poison gas, which led to the occurrence of suffocation among civilians.”

However, sources were unclear about whether only the regime was to blame, or whether culpability was also shared with Russia. Mohab Naser reported that a dual strike had taken place, asserting that the Assad regime had carried out “chlorine gas targeting” while also adding that Russian airstrikes had also struck the city. And finally, Qasioun News attributed blame to “Russian warplanes, which belong to the Syrian regime”.

SMART News interviewed some of those injured, for example Arrab Haj Qasem (Syrian Civil Defense), and Dummar Haj Qasem. “I inhaled chlorine gas while rescuing the injured, my colleagues took off my clothes and poured water on my body, and rushed me to a medical point. I was feeling shortness of breath, severe headache, a high temperature in my body, burning eyes and nausea,” said Arrab Haj Qassem .

Another injured civilian, Eyad Maher Kafrtouni, told SMART News that he hid in a basement with six of his relatives when they knew that the regime attacked with a barrel bomb, and afterwards heard someone outside shouting “they are shelling with chlorine”, so they all went up to the top of the building, poured water on themselves and on an injured person until civil defense volunteers arrived.

Another witness, Hasan Husain al Safar, said that “what happened cannot be described,” adding: “We went to the roof of the building and moistened ourselves in water. I felt shortness of breath, a desire to vomit, and burning in the eyes, I cannot describe what happened with me.”

Rami Abu Omar, again from civil defense, said that despite putting on a protective mask he had inhaled the gas. “Suddenly I lost consciousness and woke up at a medical point. I am receiving the necessary treatment. I do not remember the details of what happened.”

The Syrian Center for Human Rights posted on its Facebook page that “a helicopter carrying the code Alpha 253 took off from the School of Mujanzarat east of Hama and took the northerly direction towards the countryside of Idlib and its noise was heard above Saraqeb. And after about 20 minutes, it dropped barrels of chlorine gas near residential neighborhoods in the city of Sarqeb. More than 12 civilians suffocated, in addition to three volunteers from the Syrian Civil Defense.”

According to testimony gathered by Amnesty International, eleven people needed emergency treatment after “the Syrian government’s use of internationally banned chemical weapons was laid bare once again on February 4th after a chlorine gas attack on the town of Saraqeb.” A civil defense volunteer told Amnesty that there was no sign of any military targets in the vicinity of the bombing. Amnesty, which blamed the Syrian regime for the attack, interviewed witnesses who also reported that the wounded “couldn’t breathe, they were coughing non-stop, they had red eyes and some were vomiting severely.”

Amnesty also quoted a Syrian civil defense volunteer as saying “We heard people crying for help somewhere on the road and others on the roof of a house. Around eight people were barely able to breathe and coughing non-stop. We gave them oxygen and transferred them to the hospital. While driving, I started to feel a shortness of breath, as if I couldn’t breathe alone, and itchiness in my eyes. I felt nausea as if I wanted to throw up. My friends felt the same but we weren’t sure what was going on. I vomited when I arrived at the hospital.”

Bellingcat conducted its own remote investigation into this incident in cooperation with Syrians for Truth and Justice (STJ), which also included testimonies from survivors. Locals pointed out that plants in the targeted area turned from green to yellow; and that many locals left the area afterwards. Images taken by SMART News and Idlib Media Center show a large area of yellowed grass surrounding the impact crater, possibly caused by the release of chlorine gas. They also took images of  gas cylinders used in the attack. “This type of yellow gas cylinder has been documented at the site of multiple chlorine attacks over the past 4 years.”

The investigation quoted Hasan Qaddour, one of the medical personnel in Saraqeb who treated the victims: “The injured showed symptoms such as nausea, redness in the eyes, shortness of breath and burns in the throat, and all these symptoms indicate that they inhaled poisonous gases that could take away their lives if they were not provided the necessary care quickly. The medical staff at the medical points worked to provide health care to patients directly; we have documented 12 civilians who suffered from suffocation, including one child and three volunteers in the Civil Defense. All injuries ranged from light to medium.”

The local council of Saraqeb issued a statement reporting this attack and asking the UN urgently to investigate the use of internationally prohibited weapons against the Syrian people.

The UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, Izumi Nakamitsu, described in a briefing to the Council work being undertaken by the UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) Fact Finding Mission (FFM), which looks into all allegations of the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Nakamitsu said that “New reports by the FFM are pending. Should they conclude that there has been the use, or likely use, of chemical weapons in any of these alleged incidents, our obligation to enact a meaningful response will be further intensified.”

Meanwhile, allegations of chemical weapon use were continuing, she said, “including only this past weekend in the town of Saraqeb.”

The US Department of State released its own statement the following day, February 5th, expressing concern. “The United States is gravely alarmed by continued allegations of the use of chlorine gas by the Syrian Regime to terrorize innocent civilians, this time in Idlib Province near Saraqeb.” The statement noted that this attack was the sixth such reported incident in the last 30 days, and it implicitly blamed Russia given its involvement in Syria. The statement continues: “The Secretary noted last month in Paris that Russia ultimately bears responsibility for the victims in East Ghouta and countless other Syrians targeted with chemical weapons since Russia became involved in Syria. By shielding the Syrian regime from accountability, Russia has not lived up to its commitments. The use of chemical weapons by all parties in Syria must unequivocally stop. The people of Syria are suffering; the rest of the world is watching.”

The incident occured at approximately 9:00 pm local time.

The victims were named as:

Adult male SCD volunteer (maybe the same as Mohammed Haji Qasim) injured
Age unknown SCD volunteer injured

Summary

  • Strike status
    Contested strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Civilians reported injured
    9–24
  • Cause of injury / death
    Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN)
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Contested
    Competing claims of responsibility e.g. multiple belligerents, or casualties also attributed to ground forces.
  • Suspected attackers
    Russian Military, Syrian Regime

Sources (24) [ collapse]

Media
from sources (37) [ collapse]

  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Syria Civil Defense)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018. It is, however, unclear if this girl was wounded in this incident as Al Latamna Youth Group published her photo in relation to another strike in Idlib, also on February 4th, R2776. (via Orient News)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018. It is, however, unclear if this girl was wounded in this incident as Al Latamna Youth Group published her photo in relation to another strike in Idlib, also on February 4th, R2776. (via Orient News)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018. It is, however, unclear if this boy was wounded in this incident as Al Latamna Youth Group published his photo in relation to another strike in Idlib, also on February 4th, R2776. (via Orient News)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

    Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Orient News)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Smart News Agency)
  • Many of the wounded, including children, received treatment after being suffocated by the targeting of chlorine gas, allegedly carried out by the Assad regime and Russia in Saraqeb, Idlib, February 4th, 2018 (via Qasioun News)
  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

  • This media contains graphic content. Click to unblur.

  • A civilian in hospital after an alleged Russian or Syrian regime chemical attack on Saraqeb in Syria on Feb 4th, 2018 (via SCD)
  • Civilians being rescued by Syrian civil defense volunteers after an alleged Russian or Syrian regime chemical attack on Saraqeb in Syria on Feb 4th, 2018 (via SCD)
  • A civilians hospitalized after an alleged Russian or Syrian regime chemical attack on Saraqeb in Syria on Feb 4th, 2018 (via SCD)
  • Civilians being rescued by Syrian civil defense volunteers after an alleged Russian or Syrian regime chemical attack on Saraqeb in Syria on Feb 4th, 2018 (via SCD)
  • A metal strip and metal plate attached to each other photographed at the impact crater in Saraqib. (Bellingcat - Photo credit – Edlib Media Center.)
  • A civilian who was exposed to the gas used in the attack in Saraqeb on February 4th, 2018. (Bellingcat - Photo credit: STJ)
  • A civilian who was exposed to the gas used in the attack in Saraqeb on February 4th, 2018. (Bellingcat - Photo credit: STJ)
  • The February 4 2018 impact crater in Saraqib, Syria. (Bellingcat - Photo Credit – Edlib Media Center)
  • A yellow gas cylinder recovered from the impact site. (Bellingcat - Photo Credit – The Syrian Network for Human Rights)
  • A yellow gas cylinder recovered from the impact site. (Bellingcat - Photo Credit – The Syrian Network for Human Rights)
  • Images showing one of the gas cylinders used. (Bellingcat - Photo credit – STJ).
  • Images showing one of the gas cylinders used. (Bellingcat - Photo credit – STJ).
  • The two gas cylinders used in the attack. (Bellingcat - Source SN4HR)
  • A metal strip and metal plate attached to each other photographed at the impact crater in Saraqib. (Bellingcat - Photo credit – Edlib Media Center.)
  • Statement issued by the Local Council of Saraqib on February 5th, 2018. (Bellingcat - Image credit: the Local Council of Saraqib.)
  • Yellowing of plants at the site of the February 1st 2018 chlorine attack in Douma, Damascus. (Bellingcat - Image Credit – Syrian Scene Agency
  • The modified chlorine cylinder recovered from the site of the Khan al-Assal chlorine attack in August 2017. (Bellingcat - Image credit – Syrian Civil Defence Idlib Governorate).
  • Examples of gas cylinders used in chemical attacks in Syria. (Bellingcat - Image Credit – Human Rights Watch.)
  • People bought to hospitals in Saraqeb suffered breathing problems, a doctor said (BBC from AFP)

Geolocation notes (8) [ collapse]

Reports of the incident mention the village of Saraqib (سراقب) being struck by two alleged chemical devices. Using visual information from available sources, we have narrowed down the location of the strikes to a field within the Al Talil (التليل‎) neighbourhood. The exact coordinates of these are: 35.863036, 36.820183 and 35.863528, 36.820419. These coordinates are further confirmed by an investigation conducted by Bellingcat. See the article titled “Evidence of the February 4th 2018 Chlorine Attack on Saraqib, Idlib” dated February 14th, 2018.

  • Reports of the incident mention the village of Saraqib (سراقب) being struck by two alleged chemical devices. Using visual information from available sources, we have narrowed down the location of the strikes to a field within the Al Talil (التليل‎) neighbourhood.

    Imagery:
    Google Earth

  • The exact locations of the two alleged chemical devices in a field within the Al Talil (التليل‎) neighbourhood.

    Imagery:
    Google Earth

  • Satellite imagery showing the distribution of buildings tagged in the panoramic stitches and visual material.

    Imagery:
    Google Earth

  • Tagged buildings from source material.

    Imagery:
    SMART

  • Tagged buildings and relative location of strikes from source material.

    Imagery:
    SMART

  • Tagged buildings from source material.

    Imagery:
    SMART

  • Panoramic stitch of footage from after incident.

    Imagery:
    Haq

  • Comparison of available satellite imagery. On the left is an image from August 10th, 2017 and on the right is an image from February 2nd, 2018. Discoloration can be seen in the grass surrounding the craters.

    Imagery:
    Google Earth

Russian Military Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Russian Military
  • Russian Military position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Original strike reports

Russian Military

Russia has not reported any strikes between February 1st - 28th 2018.

Syrian Regime Assessment:

  • Suspected belligerent
    Syrian Regime
  • Syrian Regime position on incident
    Not yet assessed

Summary

  • Strike status
    Contested strike
  • Strike type
    Airstrike
  • Civilian harm reported
    Yes
  • Civilians reported killed
    Unknown
  • Civilians reported injured
    9–24
  • Cause of injury / death
    Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN)
  • Airwars civilian harm grading
    Contested
    Competing claims of responsibility e.g. multiple belligerents, or casualties also attributed to ground forces.
  • Suspected attackers
    Russian Military, Syrian Regime

Sources (24) [ collapse]